- From: Justin James <j_james@mindspring.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 13:27:00 -0400
- To: "'Olivier GENDRIN'" <olivier.gendrin@gmail.com>
- Cc: <public-html@w3.org>
Oliver - Since ARIA is not part of the HTML spec (it is a separate spec), I would imagine that ARIA (and therefore, the accessibility that comes with it) is optional, just like CSS. There might be a hidden rider in the HTML 5 draft that I have not noticed. Overall, the only mandatory accessibility item (and its status as mandatory is still being debated) is @alt, to the best of my knowledge. J.Ja -----Original Message----- From: Olivier GENDRIN [mailto:olivier.gendrin@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 6:43 AM To: Justin James Cc: public-html@w3.org Subject: Re: Proposal: ARIA-ROLE & CSS definition integration On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Justin James <j_james@mindspring.com> wrote: > > I have another proposal idea for the group. From what I can tell, the > aria-role (or aria:role, depending upon the outcome of the giant > colon/hyphen debate) attribute is for tags only. I propose that it be > possible to define the aria-/:role in CSS. For example: > > div.checkbox {aria-role: checkbox;} > <div class="checkbox">Blah blah blah</div> > > The div would be treated as if @aria-role="checkbox" had been specified. > > Comments? I will never have guessed that ARIA is presentational only. CSS is optional, is it the same for accessibility ? -- Olivier G. http://www.lespacedunmatin.info/blog/
Received on Wednesday, 4 June 2008 17:28:06 UTC