- From: Olivier GENDRIN <olivier.gendrin@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 14:25:01 +0200
- To: "Robert J Burns" <rob@robburns.com>
- Cc: "HTML Issue Tracking WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Hi Robert, On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Robert J Burns <rob@robburns.com> wrote: > My intent with this CSS declaration is to remove all such quotation (to > override with the cascade) regardless of nesting regardless of language. > Would the language selector get ranked above the attribute selector in the > cascade? Would marking it as !important do the trick? I'm not an expert on > the practicalities of CSS and I haven't tested this, but I believe that's > all that would be required for an implementation already handling quotations > in the prescribed way. > > I see too that you're responding to my erroneous CSS where it look like I"m > trying to handle both the provided and the needed attribute values. My > intent was simply to override the already existing CSS declaration when > those handle inserting quotations for Q elements. > > Take care, > Rob Oh, ok, I misundestood your proposal. So you made a mistake in the CSS rule. You wrote q[marks=provided]::before, q[marks=needed]::after {content: "";} but you meant q[marks=provided]::before, q[marks=provided]::after {content: "";}. (Note that nested multiple languages quoting can't be handled now with existing CSS rules, we are missing a pseudo-selector like '::closest'. But this particular issue is for the CSS WG.) -- Olivier G. http://www.lespacedunmatin.info/blog/
Received on Tuesday, 3 June 2008 12:25:44 UTC