- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 13:48:47 +0100
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-html@w3.org
Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 13:32:41 +0100, Julian Reschke > <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >> Just allow "<command/>". > > That just becomes a mess (if you mean that <command> should just be an > open tag), as <a/>, <script/>, <textarea/> etc. can't be made to work > that way, <br></br> parses as <br><br>, etc. Would make things very > confusing for authors. What I meant is: - no new void elements - allow empty element notation (thus "<command></command>" and "<command/>" are equivalent) for all new and future elements. This aligns the notation for new elements with XML. BR, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 31 December 2008 12:49:30 UTC