- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 11:08:21 +0100
- To: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Hi, feedback on "Define how to register new http-equiv values. (credit: ma) (whatwg r2548)": <http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#other-pragma-directives>: "...Such extensions must use a name that is identical to a previously-registered HTTP header defined in an RFC, and must have behavior identical to that described for the HTTP header...." HTTP headers do not need to be defined in RFCs, there's a registry for it. See <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4229>, <http://www.iana.org/assignments/message-headers/prov-headers.html>, and <http://www.iana.org/assignments/message-headers/perm-headers.html>. BR, Julian
Received on Saturday, 20 December 2008 10:09:05 UTC