- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:52:59 +0100
- To: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "Atom Syntax" <atom-syntax@imc.org>, www-tag@w3.org, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:29:02 +0100, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > On 10/12/2008, at 9:04 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > >> Then again, it seems the HTTP Link you define is not very much in line >> with HTML5 <link>, <a>, <area> anyway. > > Can you give a little more detail? Skimming through the drafts for a few minutes I find at least these: In HTML5 the tokens are not URIs and are not really URI-references either because they have to be case-insensitively matched (the HTML5 specification is currently wrong on this). (http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation/stylesheet and stylesheet are therefore not equal either.) In HTML5 people can simply provisionally register a new token by putting it on a wiki page. The token does not have to be a URI. (Though it could be a string that is also a URI.) In HTML5 there is no rev "link-param" because (non-academic) studies have shown that people do not really know how to use it. In HTML5 media, hreflang, and sizes (just for <link>) also influence the relationship. Your draft does not have these "link-param"s. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 10 December 2008 10:53:49 UTC