- From: Křištof Želechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:25:25 +0200
- To: "'Maurice'" <maurice@thymeonline.com>
- Cc: <public-html@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 28 April 2008 12:28:44 UTC
I do not remember the debate and when I wanted to refresh my memory using the archives, I got pipermail errors nested three times. As far as I can understand, @longdesc is out-but I do not know why. I think your suggestion would be great for managing application translations. Chris -----Original Message----- From: Maurice [mailto:maurice@thymeonline.com] Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 4:10 AM To: Křištof Želechovski Cc: public-html@w3.org Subject: Re: [whatwg] several messages about the HTML syntax New Idea! Remember the long debate about whether longdesc on images was useful or not? I and a few other people had a similar idea. Longdesc: A URL to a document that contains a long description of the image I think longdesc should be expanded to all attributes. It will be used as a native (no javascript needed) way of making more useful tooltips. It's value can either be a full url or the id of an element on the current page or the id of an element on another page(but this would require loading a whole other file in the background just to get a small portion of it).
Received on Monday, 28 April 2008 12:28:44 UTC