- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:53:05 -0700
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: Ben Boyle <benjamins.boyle@gmail.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, John Foliot <foliot@wats.ca>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Apr 17, 2008, at 1:47 PM, Dan Connolly wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 19:21 +1000, Ben Boyle wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: >>> All of these are subjective conformance criteria that are key >>> accessibility questions. >>> >>> All of these also apply to HTML4 documents. >>> >>> I see no way to make these anything but subjective. How do you >>> suggest we >>> address these problems? >> >> I suggest leaving them to WCAG, to avoid repetition and potential >> conflict (should WCAG in some incompatible way). > > > That's one of the more interesting suggestions I've seen in > this discussion. It seems like a good way to reduce > our workload by leveraging work done elsewhere. Semantics of elements are not solely accessibility issues. I do not think it makes sense to define them solely in an accessibility document separate from the spec. Regard, Maciej
Received on Thursday, 17 April 2008 21:53:43 UTC