Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)

On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, Al Gilman wrote:
> I think that you can take my statement that "the editor has not 
> addressed what we told you already" as authoritative.

If I haven't replied to an e-mail sent prior to this e-mail:

Please let me know. I thought I had dealt with all feedback prior to that 

If there is feedback after that point that introduces new ideas that I 
haven't replied to, please let me know as well. I haven't replied to all 
messages after that point because most of them are merely reiterating the 
same arguments over and over (including my own e-mails!).


...I did carefully read this message the spec has changed to take into 
account that feedback. However, that e-mail was rather vague and it wasn't 
at all clear to me exactly what was desired. (The strange pseudo-XML was 
somewhat confusing too. I wasn't sure exactly what I was supposed to do.) 
It does not appear that I sent an explicit reply to this e-mail, 
presumably because of my confusion when reading it. I expect I dealt with 
it while writing the first e-mail cited above.

If there is some more concrete feedback that I should deal with, I would 
encourage you to send it.

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Wednesday, 16 April 2008 19:21:47 UTC