- From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:57:08 -0400
- To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "Tomas Caspers" <tomas@tomascaspers.de>
- Cc: "John Foliot" <foliot@wats.ca>, <wai-xtech@w3.org>, <wai-liaison@w3.org>, <public-html@w3.org>, "HTML4All" <list@html4all.org>
The at has no way of knowing whether or not the images are associated unless markup to do so is present. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch> To: "Tomas Caspers" <tomas@tomascaspers.de> Cc: "John Foliot" <foliot@wats.ca>; <wai-xtech@w3.org>; <wai-liaison@w3.org>; <public-html@w3.org>; "HTML4All" <list@html4all.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 3:26 PM Subject: Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools On Tue, 15 Apr 2008, Tomas Caspers wrote: > > Am 15.04.2008 um 20:48 schrieb John Foliot: > > Any information is better than no information. It puts the images in a > > rudimentary context (this is image 4 of 9 on the page). A non-visual > > user > > still may have no idea what the image really is, but can be told that > > image > > number 4 at the "photo-upload site" is of their grandchild, and they > > could > > then copy the file to a flash drive, and have the photo printed and > > framed > > for when visitors come over to visit (just to make the scenario "real"). > > The same would be true if the AT involved simply read out the filename, > as some of them do in absence of an alt-Attribute. Indeed the AT itself could read out the "1 of 4" thing -- and at least then there would be a reasonably good chance of the numbering being correct, which would not be the case if we relied on the author. :-) -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 15 April 2008 19:57:59 UTC