- From: Philip TAYLOR <Philip-and-LeKhanh@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org>
- Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:21:34 +0100
- To: HTML4All <list@html4all.org>
- CC: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, wai-xtech@w3.org, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@ieee.org>
Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >> Saying that such products should be >> programmed to output invalid HTML isn't a viable answer, either. > > Why not? Almost *every* tool I know of that produces HTML produces invalid > HTML, so I am not sure how you determine that there is some existential > reason why this cannot happen. Are you serious, Charles ? Are you really arguing that the generating of invalid code is an acceptable option ? If so, I would seriously suggest you move a motion to disolve the W3C, since it would have no role whatsoever in the anarchic world that you appear to be willing to tolerate. Phiip TAYLOR
Received on Friday, 11 April 2008 10:22:15 UTC