Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html

On Apr 4, 2008, at 12:01, David Carlisle wrote:
>> Indeed, and we already have name clashes (one, for MathML..)
> Is there? MathML 1.0 had a select element which we renamed to selector
> to avoid clahing with html (just in case, 10 years later someone would
> try to merge the two without relying on namespaces to differentiate:-)
> What's the current clash?


It's not valid in HTML, but existing content requires it to be magic  
in parsing.

Henri Sivonen

Received on Friday, 4 April 2008 09:08:00 UTC