- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 09:51:08 +0200
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>, Sam Ruby <rubys@us.ibm.com>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, Bruce Miller <bruce.miller@nist.gov>, Neil Soiffer <Neils@dessci.com>, jg307@cam.ac.uk, public-html@w3.org, www-math@w3.org
Ian Hickson wrote: > ... >> Finally, breaking a handful of legacy pages isn't yet a "fatal" flaw. > > I believe it is. > ... For the record: strong disagreement. *Any* change to the language can cause existing, invalid content to break. So this is de facto an argument for not doing any changes at all. BR, Julian
Received on Thursday, 3 April 2008 07:52:33 UTC