- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 11:55:16 +0100
- To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Cc: public-html-xml@w3.org
On Jan 20, 2011, at 10:29 , David Carlisle wrote: > On 20/01/2011 07:56, Robin Berjon wrote: >> Can't someone scare up a MathElement specification? > > mathml2 had a full mathml dom spec including a hasFeature String > > http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML2/chapter8.html#id.8.1.1 The hasFeature approach is a pretty lousy way of doing feature detection (not your fault, everyone was doing it at some point; it's pretty much been abandoned now) but it's still a shame that at least a subset of this didn't make it into implementation. Ah well, water under the bridge I guess. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
Received on Thursday, 20 January 2011 10:55:47 UTC