- From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 12:01:23 -0500
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, public-html-xml@w3.org, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Sam Ruby scripsit: > To make this concrete: I'm arguing *FOR* producers of XHTML5 to use the > self-closing syntax when emitting br elements and not to use the > self-closing syntax when emitting script elements. I've never heard a > satisfactory answer to the question as to why the spec is defined this > way, What's wrong with "bug-for-bug compatibility", aka "When in Rome, shoot off Roman candles" as a rationale? -- Values of beeta will give rise to dom! John Cowan (5th/6th edition 'mv' said this if you tried http://www.ccil.org/~cowan to rename '.' or '..' entries; see cowan@ccil.org http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/who/dmr/odd.html)
Received on Wednesday, 5 January 2011 17:01:52 UTC