- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 14:29:45 -0700
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>
On Sep 8, 2009, at 8:43 AM, Dan Connolly wrote: > I thought issue-37 was closed; ignoring a bit > of out-of-order discussion is find, but you > guys are actively participating... > > But now I see it's actually pending review > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/37 > > Is there some proposal in "any objections?" mode? > When are objections due? > > Or is the issue actually open again and tracker has > fallen a bit behind? I think the remaining finer-grained issues from Cameron and others all need to be filed as bugs. I need to review Cameron's latest email to make sure all the issues are represented properly. At that point I think there is no objection to closing. Regards, Maciej > > On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 13:52 -0700, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >> On Sep 7, 2009, at 11:08 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > [...] >>> Suggestion: take a random svg image out of wikipedia and search for >>> "sodipodi". Getting rid of the errors in a small portion of the >>> image isn't going to undo the damage to both the adoption of SVG or >>> the adoption of the conformance checker by flagging the remaining >>> "errors". >> >> I think many of these cases are also errors in SVG 1.1, and are >> reported as such by the SVG 1.1 validator. Apparently, Wikipedia's >> adoption of SVG has not been hindered by these errors, though one may >> at this point doubt their willingness to adopt conformance checking. >> >> Regards, >> Maciej >> > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E >
Received on Tuesday, 8 September 2009 21:30:32 UTC