W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org > September 2009

Re: More on SVG within HTML pages (issue-37 status?)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 10:43:42 -0500
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1252424622.22683.31138.camel@pav.lan>
I thought issue-37 was closed; ignoring a bit
of out-of-order discussion is find, but you
guys are actively participating...

But now I see it's actually pending review
  http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/37

Is there some proposal in "any objections?" mode?
When are objections due?

Or is the issue actually open again and tracker has
fallen a bit behind?

On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 13:52 -0700, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> On Sep 7, 2009, at 11:08 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
[...]
> > Suggestion: take a random svg image out of wikipedia and search for  
> > "sodipodi".  Getting rid of the errors in a small portion of the  
> > image isn't going to undo the damage to both the adoption of SVG or  
> > the adoption of the conformance checker by flagging the remaining  
> > "errors".
> 
> I think many of these cases are also errors in SVG 1.1, and are  
> reported as such by the SVG 1.1 validator. Apparently, Wikipedia's  
> adoption of SVG has not been hindered by these errors, though one may  
> at this point doubt their willingness to adopt conformance checking.
> 
> Regards,
> Maciej
> 
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 8 September 2009 15:43:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:48:29 UTC