- From: James Graham <james@hoppipolla.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 19:04:14 +0100
- To: public-html-testsuite@w3.org
On 16/09/13 18:51, Rik Cabanier wrote: > Hi Philip, > > I quickly looked over the failed results. > > For the first table, the tests are not really testing canvas pattern > but the 'loading state' of images which is not part of canvas 2d. They appear to be testing the interactions between canvas and other parts of the platform. This is not only a legitimate thing to test but one of the most important. > For the second table: - the type of exception for the imageData > failures are not in the spec so this is undefined behavior - same for > the gradient failures. - same for drawImage They are specified in WebIDL. > For the third table, the 'font' property is supposed to return the > serialized value. This is outside the scope of the canvas 2d spec > (and also seems underunspecified) Again, the interaction of canvas with other specifications is a totally legitimate thing to test. Serialization of CSS properties is well defined these days [1], although iirc this is rather new and may not be reflected in the tests and/or implementations yet. [1] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/cssom/#serializing-css-values
Received on Monday, 16 September 2013 18:04:38 UTC