- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 12:11:55 +0100
- To: Dzenana Trenutak <dzenana.trenutak@gmail.com>
- CC: public-html-testsuite@w3.org
On 18/01/2013 18:49 , Dzenana Trenutak wrote: > After giving the "sections" section a try (as submitted to GitHub on > Jan. 15), I'm moving on to "grouping". It looks like many of these > elements can be approached with the same tests as for "sections", so > code review feedback will indeed be useful. :-) Please don't > hesitate to be as nit-picky as you have time for - I'd like to write > these tests exactly as you'd prefer them. I'm also curious if I > captured all necessary tests for the "sections" section or if I missed > something. Thanks a lot for that! Ms2ger has been reviewing your tests — I hope you find the feedback useful. > At the moment, I have a question re: a difference between the CR draft > and the Nightly on a "grouping" element - for <li>, CR contains this > note that was removed from Nightly: "Note: If the li element is the > child of a menu element and itself has a child that defines a command, > then the li element will match the :enabled and :disabled > pseudo-classes in the same way as the first such child element does." > Is it likely that this will be removed from the CR draft as well, or > should I go ahead to test this statement? As James said, this isn't normative so it shouldn't be the source of a test. But in general, the way we work is that the master branch contains all tests that apply to the most up-to-date spec (nightly) and we have a CR branch for stuff that's just in CR. Right now, given the tests we have, those are pretty much the same thing so I wouldn't worry too much about it. That said, if you do submit tests for which you know there's a difference please make sure to indicate that in the pull request (it helps reviewers to know what they're reviewing against). Finally, if you see a feature that's in CR but not in nightly, I think you probably shouldn't bother testing it. It's very likely something that will get dropped. Thanks a lot! -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Monday, 21 January 2013 11:11:59 UTC