- From: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:30:33 +0100
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- CC: Kris Krueger <krisk@microsoft.com>, Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>, "public-html-testsuite@w3.org" <public-html-testsuite@w3.org>
On 03/17/2011 06:51 AM, L. David Baron wrote: > I thought there was consensus at the testing meeting at the plenary > that we shouldn't have a review process like this. Instead, we > should accept tests eagerly and allow mistakes to be challenged > easily. Without responding to the more general point; I note that the HTMLWG as a whole has charter requirements preventing decisions from being made at F2F meetings, or other venues requiring synchronous participation. I assume those requirements cover the testing task-force as well. If they formally don't, I strongly believe that we should adopt them anyway.
Received on Thursday, 17 March 2011 09:31:16 UTC