W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-testsuite@w3.org > November 2010

Re: choice of javascript DOM methods suitable for use in tests

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 00:04:13 +0100
To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>
Cc: "Kris Krueger" <krisk@microsoft.com>, "public-html-testsuite@w3.org" <public-html-testsuite@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.vm0adbhy64w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook-pro.local>
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:30:38 +0100, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>  
> On Nov 30, 2010, at 11:23 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>> I don't understand how much crisper it could be. Could you elaborate?
> Perhaps there could be a conformance class for which the rendering  
> section is a MUST-level requirement.
> (It can't be all visual interactive UAs, since mobile browsers and other  
> specialized UAs commonly make different visual formatting choices, so it  
> would have to be a new conformance class.)
> Having such a conformance class would be useful only if there are UAs  
> that would target 100% compliance with the rendering section. It sounds  
> like we do expect this, for mainstream desktop browsers in their default  
> configuration.

I guess the question is whether making it a MUST for certain user agents  
would actually affect crispness as it is pretty crispy already.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Tuesday, 30 November 2010 23:05:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 15:49:37 UTC