- From: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 17:42:05 -0700
- To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Cc: "Jerry Smith (IEP)" <jdsmith@microsoft.com>, David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com>, Matt Wolenetz <wolenetz@google.com>, "public-html-media@w3.org" <public-html-media@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAEnTvdDUXXP8H87yDydqR_wA2ETHux=zi7JrcYzFHamJGm3T+Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> wrote: > > Ideally, here what I think the editors could use: > > - use a master branch for the respec version of the version and edits and > PRs go against that branch. > - set the master branch to have the web UI use squash instead of merge > - use the gh-page branch to have the draft automatically generated into > everytime there is a commit or a merge into the master branch. > > You avoid merge conflict on the generated draft like that. > On the generated file, yes. But those conflicts are easy to resolve. > Philippe > > On 05/12/2016 05:05 PM, Jerry Smith (IEP) wrote: > >> Is our working guidance to avoid rebasing in the branch where the Pull >> Request originates? I know the merge flow creates a branch for this, >> but have also had folks advise me to periodically rebase to stay on top >> of merge conflicts. >> > That would be ideal, except that the force push needed after a rebase obscures / destroys (not sure which) comment history in the PR. Everything I read about git workflows favors rebasing though ... > >> The modified flow from Mark below seems much like our current manual >> process, right? >> > Yes, except that (i) the working branch used for the final merge is left as a visible PR and (ii) github does the squash automatically. ...Mark >> Jerry >> >> *From:*Mark Watson [mailto:watsonm@netflix.com] >> *Sent:* Thursday, May 12, 2016 10:29 AM >> *To:* David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com> >> *Cc:* Jerry Smith (IEP) <jdsmith@microsoft.com>; Matt Wolenetz >> <wolenetz@google.com>; public-html-media@w3.org; Philippe Le Hégaret >> <plh@w3.org> >> *Subject:* Re: Using GitHub's merge button >> >> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:13 AM, David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com >> <mailto:ddorwin@google.com>> wrote: >> >> Currently, our process [1] is to manually squash and commit pull >> requests. This was discussed in the thread ending in [2] >> >> As mentioned in the review of EME #165, it appears GitHub now >> supports squashing via the big green button [3], and HTML now allows >> use of the button [4]. I believe we can do the same thing. >> >> As discussed in #165, there are still some details to figure out: >> >> * We need Philippe or someone else with admin access to verify >> both types are allowed in the GitHub repo settings [5]. >> * Rebasing/merging: Rebasing might cause problems for history. >> (See the last paragraph below.) We might instead need to use >> merges when updating PRs. Either way, the squashed commit should >> be a single commit. >> >> o We might need to experiment here. >> >> Can GitHub really squash the commits if there are merges in there ? >> That seems like a process that could result in conflicts. >> >> We may need to do the following: >> >> (1) Create a new branch off the PR branch >> >> (2) Rebase in that new branch, force push >> >> (3) Make a new PR from the new branch and merge this, with squashing >> >> (4) Decline the original PR >> >> Each change would then have two PRs, the original one which documents >> the history and discussion and a rebased one which has the clean changes >> to the then-latest specification, still in separate commits. >> >> ...Mark >> >> >> >> o As an aside, it's helpful to the reviewer to delay >> rebasing/merging until the end. >> >> The process will be approximately: >> >> * Push the green "Merge pull request" button. >> * Review and clean up the commit message. >> * Select "Confirm squash and merge" >> >> Using the button should pretty much eliminate forced pushes, which >> can cause diffs with comments to be lost as mentioned in #165. >> >> [1] https://github.com/w3c/encrypted-media/blob/gh-pages/TEAM.md >> >> [2] >> >> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2015Nov/0011.html >> >> [3] https://github.com/blog/2141-squash-your-commits >> >> [4] https://github.com/whatwg/html/blob/master/TEAM.md >> >> [5] >> >> https://help.github.com/articles/configuring-pull-request-merge-squashing/ >> >>
Received on Friday, 13 May 2016 00:42:36 UTC