- From: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 13:28:19 -0700
- To: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "public-html-media@w3.org" <public-html-media@w3.org>, "Jerry Smith (WPT)" <jdsmith@microsoft.com>, Greg Rutz <G.Rutz@cablelabs.com>, David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com>, "Matthew Wolenetz <wolenetz@google.com> (wolenetz@google.com)" <wolenetz@google.com>, "Philippe Le Hegaret (plh@w3.org)" <plh@w3.org>, Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>, Iraj Sodagar <irajs@microsoft.com>, John Simmons <johnsim@microsoft.com>, Sukhmal Kommidi <skommidi@netflix.com>
- Message-ID: <CAEnTvdDZ+QJq50menJyezRRdkrUJS0CjE8iKx=vt1WFwP2QDRw@mail.gmail.com>
All, The previous pull request has become very large. I will break it up into a sequence of smaller ones. To facilitate this, I need to merge one PR that establishes the latest framework. The other PRs can then be reviewed in parallel. So, the first of this sequence is https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/3355/files I URGENTLY need review of this PR. If we are to meet our deadline of August 2, I presume we need the tests running this week and I will have limited time to work on this tomorrow and Friday. I don't think there is much point in attempting to meet the August 2 deadline if noone is able to review the test PRs. ...Mark On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com> wrote: > All, > > Update for today: My Pull Request ( > https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/3324) now has updated mp4 > content and consolidated content metadata. Some re-arrangement is still > needed to support the AV multi-key case (separate audio and video keys). I > expect to get content tomorrow with multiple keys within one video stream. > I'll continue to add tests tomorrow. > > The space of combinations of content type, key system and init data type > is quite large and not fully covered (or all that well organized in the > code). Some tests just need to discover a supported combination, others are > constrained by what the DRM server supports as well as what the client > component supports. I'll also look at how we can organize this better. > > As before, review of the PR is welcome! > > ...Mark > > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> > wrote: > >> > I will be working on the other tests on and off early next week. If >> anyone else is able to help, please coordinate with me. >> >> >> >> I am moving this discussion [1] to public-html-media@w3.org so that we >> touch as many HME WG members as possible. >> >> >> >> Mark and others: Please use this thread for any future updates on the >> status of EME testing. >> >> >> >> /paulc >> >> >> >> [1] >> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-hme-editors/2016Jul/0056.html >> >> >> >> *From:* Mark Watson [mailto:watsonm@netflix.com] >> *Sent:* Friday, July 22, 2016 5:25 PM >> *To:* Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> >> *Cc:* Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com>; Greg Rutz < >> G.Rutz@cablelabs.com>; David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com>; Matthew >> Wolenetz <wolenetz@google.com> (wolenetz@google.com) <wolenetz@google.com>; >> Philippe Le Hegaret (plh@w3.org) <plh@w3.org>; Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>; >> public-hme-editors@w3.org; Iraj Sodagar <irajs@microsoft.com>; John >> Simmons <johnsim@microsoft.com>; Sukhmal Kommidi <skommidi@netflix.com> >> *Subject:* Re: DRM Today-based test case for EME >> >> >> >> All, >> >> >> >> I migrated a handful of the Google tests: >> https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/3324 >> >> >> >> Currently, the "drm-events" test fails because the DRM server is unaware >> of the key id that is used (and I am unaware of the key id that it does >> know). I'm working with Greg on this. >> >> >> >> I noticed the following whilst doing this work: >> >> - We probably need to organize the content metadata (key ids, keys, >> MIME types etc.) into one place - presently they are scattered around in a >> confusing way >> - The idea of auto-generating the HTML stubs needs some more thought >> - they are presently a bit different for each test >> - Some of the Google tests look (to me at least) like they might be >> Chrome-specific. Specifically, the lifetime tests use window.internals and >> I am not sure if this is cross-platform. Likewise, I do not know if the >> garbage collection stuff is cross-platform or not. >> - We need some additional mp4 content files (I am in touch with Greg >> about this): >> >> >> - Encrypted audio >> - Video with multiple keys >> >> I will be working on the other tests on and off early next week. If >> anyone else is able to help, please coordinate with me. >> >> >> >> Sukhmal is working on persistent-usage-record and persistent-license >> tests, which should be ready next week. >> >> >> >> ...Mark >> >> >> >> >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 27 July 2016 20:28:52 UTC