- From: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 11:38:13 -0700
- To: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "public-html-media@w3.org" <public-html-media@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAEnTvdBOZmCh8zz7iz_2W6sh+M+o2nyGLGXkoMtPL91baJT+8g@mail.gmail.com>
All, My suggestion on the call today was that this work could be divided into two parts: Phase I: Further develop the "clear key" protocol to support the features we believe should be standardized Phase ||: Define security wrapping for the "clear key" protocol that would enable its use as a real DRM protocol I wonder if Phase I might be considered in scope ? This would enable us to make progress on that in advance of the re-chartering or new group creation needed to work on Phase ||. The answer to this question depends on the reasons that the team judged the overall task out-of-scope. ...Mark On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> wrote: > ACTION-88: Check on whether the proposed generic license > request/response protocol is in scope of the current html wg charter > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/media/track/actions/88 > > > > At the Media Task Force F2F I was asked to check to see if Joe’s proposed > work on a generic license request/response protocol is in the scope of the > Task Force and/or the HTML WG charter [1]: > > https://github.com/steelejoe/eme-generic-protocol > > > > I have discussed with the W3C Team and they are of the opinion this work > is NOT currently in scope of the HTML WG. The next step therefore is to > discuss adding this item to a revised charter which is required since the > current charter expires on June 30. I am working on this with the W3C Team. > > > > /paulc > > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2013/09/html-charter.html > > > > Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada > > 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 > > Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329 > > >
Received on Tuesday, 5 May 2015 18:38:44 UTC