[Bug 28379] New: [MSE] should buffering model be an option?

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28379

            Bug ID: 28379
           Summary: [MSE] should buffering model be an option?
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: PC
                OS: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Media Source Extensions
          Assignee: adrianba@microsoft.com
          Reporter: billconan@gmail.com
        QA Contact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-media@w3.org

should buffering model be an option?

I'm working on a remote desktop application using Media source. What I noticed
is that media source is designed only for video streaming use cases where
smoothness is more important than latency.

However, for the remote desktop use case, low latency is preferred. With the
currently implementation in Chrome, little network hiccups will trigger the
buffering behavior of mediasource, and user will end up seeing video pauses.

why can't the buffering model be an option instead? for example when
addSourceBuffer, we could specify "no-delay" to indicate no buffering.

Thanks.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Received on Monday, 30 March 2015 20:18:10 UTC