On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:28 PM, David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com> wrote: > Thank you for informing us of your work. > > The introduction says, "it is not expected that a device will use this > exchange format." Thus, I do not think it applies to any of the work we are > doing. However, it is good to see parallel efforts to improve the > interoperability of different content protection systems. > > If DASH-IF were to consider extending something like this to the client > (UA or CDM), I would be concerned about the use of XML due to the size, > complexity, and security implications. > What are you talking about? Size, complexity, and security implications for XML? > > Regards, > David > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> > wrote: > >> Please find attached a liaison statement from DASH Industry Forum >> (DASH-IF) on their work on guidelines for Content Protection Information >> Exchange Format. >> >> >> >> I am sending this on behalf of Iraj Sodagar who is copied on this email. >> >> >> >> /paulc >> >> >> >> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada >> >> 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 >> >> Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329 >> >> >> > >
Received on Saturday, 7 March 2015 02:23:48 UTC