> On Jul 8, 2015, at 5:30 AM, Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org> wrote:
>
> Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, 2015-07-06 19:41 +0000:
>> Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/BN3PR0301MB118535D834D4DD5A67AF3CB2EA930@BN3PR0301MB1185.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
>>
>>> Many of the *Track interface pieces are yet to be implemented in Chrome,
>>
>> Are these currently interfaces implemented in any other MSE implementations?
>
> I believe they are not supported in an UAs at all yet.
They are supported in Safari, as of version 8.0.
-Jer
> Certainly we don’t have two UAs that support them.
>
> Given that, it’s not clear to me why they weren’t listed as “at risk” in
> the CR publication. We’re definitely not going to be transition the spec
> out of CR if we can’t document that we have at least two implementations of
> those features (and we actually don’t even have tests for those features
> themselves yet—all we have at this point is just the simple test that
> checks whether the interface exposes members for them as expected).
>
> One option of course is to drop them from the spec (and move them to a v2)
> and take just the sets of features to Rec for which we can demonstrate that
> we have at least two implementations.
>
> —Mike
>
> --
> Michael[tm] Smith https://people.w3.org/mike