- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 20:24:43 +0000
- To: public-html-media@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26811
Bug ID: 26811
Summary: Separate definitions of Initialization Data Types from
Stream Format parsing
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P4
Component: Encrypted Media Extensions
Assignee: adrianba@microsoft.com
Reporter: ddorwin@google.com
QA Contact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-media@w3.org
Blocks: 26738
Currently, the Encrypted Media Extensions Stream Format and Initialization Data
Format Registry [1] is organized such that each Initialization Data Type has
its own page, which covers both the Initialization Data format and - where
applicable - how to parse the associated stream (i.e. container).
However:
* The Initialization Data Type and stream format are used by two different
parts of implementations:
- The user agent uses the stream format to extract the initialization data,
but does not necessarily care about its format.
- The CDM only needs to know how to parse the Initialization Data format and
does not need to parse the stream/container.
- Note: A packager, which is not covered by the spec, needs to know both.
* Initialization Data Types do not necessarily have an associated container
(e.g. "keyids")
* An Initialization Data Type may apply to more than one stream/container
format (bug 26738).
We should have a table and page for Initialization Data Types and separate
pages for stream/container parsing information. Maybe we can use the MIME type
as the index for a table pointing to the latter pages.
[1]
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html-media/raw-file/default/encrypted-media/initdata-format-registry.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Monday, 15 September 2014 20:24:45 UTC