- From: Joe Steele <steele@adobe.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 15:51:12 +0000
- To: "<public-html-media@w3.org>" <public-html-media@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <DCF74C6F-DAFC-498F-9D0A-0751D033EA62@adobe.com>
http://www.w3.org/2014/10/14-html-media-minutes.html Joe Steele HTML Media Task Force Teleconference 14 Oct 2014 Agenda See also: IRC log Attendees Present BobLund, bevans, cpoole, ddorwin, geguchi, jamil, jdsmith, joesteele, pal, paulc Regrets markw Chair Paul Cotton Scribe paulc, joesteele Contents Topics Outstanding EME bugs Bug 25923 - The mechanism for checking key system support should be asynchronous Bug 25966 - Use ArrayBufferView and ArrayBuffer instead of Uint8Array in APIs Bug 26332 Applications should only use EME APIs on secure origins (e.g. HTTPS) Bug 26776 Diagnosing and resolving CDM errors needs a numeric systemCode (deleted with MediaKeyError) Bug 26887 Allowing license servers and CDMs to control data persistence and secure release Bug 26738 Add entry for MPEG-2 TS CENC to the Stream Format Registry Bug 26372 Report issues/events not related to a specific method call Bug 26811 Separate definitions of Initialization Data Types from Stream Format parsing Bug 26573 Prepare for Last Call Bug 24771 Provide guidance on object and CDM lifetime (including when events are guaranteed to be fired) Bug 26838 Normatively address vulnerabilities related to initData contained in media data bug 25092 Need a way to inform script that resolution restrictions are applied Bug 25268 Reduce the burden on applications to deduplicate initData from many needkey events Bug 25217 Add ability to specify license domain for key requests Bug 20944 EME should do more to encourage/ensure CDM-level interop Bug 25434 Remove unsupported informative text in Abstract regarding OOB communication. Bug 24082 Several issues discussed in the TF point to the need for defined extensibility points in EME bug 23827 Need to add features at risk prior to entry into Candidate Recommendation bug 24874 Positive isTypeSupported() may be misleading (MSE vs. .src=) going forward Summary of Action Items <trackbot> Date: 14 October 2014 <paulc> EME bugs: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&component=Encrypted%20Media%20Extensions&list_id=45497&product=HTML%20WG&query_format=advanced <bevans> is me <paulc> Regrets were received from Mark W: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2014Oct/0019.html <paulc> Scribenick: paulc EME bugs: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&component=Encrypted%20Media%20Extensions&list_id=45497&product=HTML%20WG&query_format=advanced Outstanding EME bugs Bug 25923 - The mechanism for checking key system support should be asynchronous Open issues that need to be discussed: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25923#c42 David is working is on the open issues and will request feedback when he makes more progress. Bug 25966 - Use ArrayBufferView and ArrayBuffer instead of Uint8Array in APIs https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25966 This bug is editorial and David is awaiting IDL feedback due to a possible bug in IDL spec. <joesteele> scribenick: joesteele <scribe> chair: paulc <paulc> EME bugs: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&component=Encrypted%20Media%20Extensions&list_id=45497&product=HTML%20WG&query_format=advanced Bug 26332 Applications should only use EME APIs on secure origins (e.g. HTTPS) <paulc> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26332 paulc: this is in the security related batch <paulc> See also security item: Bug 26838 - Normatively address vulnerabilities related to initData contained in media data paulc: other one in this batch is <paulc> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26838#c2 paulc: I would propose we continue discussing these ... and have at least these two on the agenda at the F2F and see if we can make progress ... any others for this batch? ... David? ddorwin: don't think so Bug 26776 Diagnosing and resolving CDM errors needs a numeric systemCode (deleted with MediaKeyError) <paulc> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26776 paulc: Jerry is on point? jdsmith: yes -- proposal at F2F Bug 26887 Allowing license servers and CDMs to control data persistence and secure release jdsmith: we need to update based on comments from last week <paulc> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26887 paulc: let me add the minutes Bug 26738 Add entry for MPEG-2 TS CENC to the Stream Format Registry paulc: Bob Lund on point for this? <paulc> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26738 joesteele: Bob if you are speaking we can't hear you ddorwin: 26811 is still blocked on this <paulc> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26811 <paulc> Bug 26811 - Separate definitions of Initialization Data Types from Stream Format parsing paulc: David, can you give us the status of 26811? ddorwin: lower priority, have not done anything recently ... I am on point paulc: after this Bob Lund can do 26738? ddorwin: yes Bug 26372 Report issues/events not related to a specific method call <paulc> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26372 ddorwin: I will implement this proposal this week paulc: then should be on next week or the F2F agenda ... is there actually a proposal? ddorwin: the proposal was Map-like paulc: looking for a comment to describe that ... but we have a clear indication of what to do ddorwin: I am doing that Bug 26811 Separate definitions of Initialization Data Types from Stream Format parsing <paulc> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26811 paulc: that status from above is here ... David is on point, lower priority Bug 26573 Prepare for Last Call <paulc> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26573 paulc: editorial cleanup ddorwin: on my list, low priority Bug 24771 Provide guidance on object and CDM lifetime (including when events are guaranteed to be fired) ddorwin: proposal was accepted - was waiting on respec <paulc> Previously dependent on https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24322 (new objects and respec) <paulc> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24771 Bug 26838 Normatively address vulnerabilities related to initData contained in media data <paulc> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26838 paulc: bakc to things that have not been worked on in awhile ddorwin: added some text to this but left it open ... in case other things should be added <paulc> Changes are outlined in https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26838#c2 paulc: so we could discuss and possibly close at the F2F? ddorwin: sure? ... could close now bug 25092 Need a way to inform script that resolution restrictions are applied <paulc> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25092#c23 for recent history paulc: looks like from comment 23 Mark has been talking to www-style about this ... Mark is not here ... what should we do if we do not hear back? has been a month? joesteele: does anyone have direct contact with www-style? jdsmith: think we still have a need - don't want to stream if client is downscaling paulc: Mark Watson is on point and Paul I will follow up Bug 25268 Reduce the burden on applications to deduplicate initData from many needkey events <paulc> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25268 ddorwin: we tried to fix, but we don't have a good proposal or idea yet <paulc> See https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25268#c6 paulc: who will lead the discussion at the F2F to outline this problem? ... one of the editors? <paulc> tl;dr: The current solution is broken and does not help many applications. ddorwin: not sure we will get any ideas at the F2F paulc: that would be one route forward ... if folks come with proposals that would be better jdsmith: David you opened this bug, do you want to keep it open ddorwin: I am inclined to close this as well paulc: that may happen at the F2F Bug 25217 Add ability to specify license domain for key requests <paulc> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25217 joesteele: I think we can do this later -- I will ad a comment to that effect paulc: we can mark as RESOLVE LATER later Bug 20944 EME should do more to encourage/ensure CDM-level interop paulc: this will obviously remain open -- no discussion since May ... we get flamed when we try to do something ... we will put on the F2F ... is this related to the TAG document? ddorwin: same spirit, but not directly related paulc: TAG is not meeting in Santa Clara, they had a recent F2F <paulc> See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2014Oct/0002.html pal: I think part of the challened if that the TAG is very early in its thinking -- the document has fluctuated a lot ... once the doc has become more firm, it would be good for us to review this doc paulc: Mark has done this and provided feedback ... he responded to Dominics comments ... composition of the TAG has changed as well since then pal: it might be for entire group good to consider this <scribe> ACTION: paulc to contact TAG and determine what their status is and whether we should review/comment [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/10/14-html-media-minutes.html#action01] <trackbot> Created ACTION-66 - Contact tag and determine what their status is and whether we should review/comment [on Paul Cotton - due 2014-10-21]. pal: that works Bug 25434 Remove unsupported informative text in Abstract regarding OOB communication. paulc: about side channels <scribe> ... no progress since May ddorwin: editors closed this bug and it was reopened <paulc> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25434 paulc: does that mean the editors would like to figure out something new before the F2F? ddorwin: there is a philosophical difference of opinion Bug 24082 Several issues discussed in the TF point to the need for defined extensibility points in EME <paulc> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24082 joesteele: very similar to interop bug in my opinion paulc: have not come back to this in awhile ... this was opened by Adrian ... Jerry can you take an action to discuss this with him? <scribe> ACTION: jdsmith to discuss bug 2082 with Adrian re - resolution [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/10/14-html-media-minutes.html#action02] <trackbot> Created ACTION-67 - Discuss bug 2082 with adrian re - resolution [on Jerry Smith - due 2014-10-21]. bug 23827 Need to add features at risk prior to entry into Candidate Recommendation <paulc> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23827 paulc: looks administrative -- don't need to worry about that <paulc> Administrative for entry to CR bug 24874 Positive isTypeSupported() may be misleading (MSE vs. .src=) <paulc> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24874 paulc: has not been touched since March jdsmith: David has the only comment -- think we just need to make a decision - he has three options paulc: David can we cue for F2F? Or is next week ok? ddorwin: Jerry is right -- we just need to decide whether to solve. We have another option now based on how MediaKey get created -- bug 25923 <paulc> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25923 ddorwin: I will update the bug with that info going forward paulc: we are in position to move forward on an number of these bugs, I suggest that we give people time to work on their action items and adjourn for the day ... editors, commenters, etc ... any comments? ... you will see a detailed agenda from me ahead of time ... ok, you can all have 20 min back <paulc> good morning, everyone Summary of Action Items [NEW] ACTION: jdsmith to discuss bug 2082 with Adrian re - resolution [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/10/14-html-media-minutes.html#action02] [NEW] ACTION: paulc to contact TAG and determine what their status is and whether we should review/comment [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/10/14-html-media-minutes.html#action01] [End of minutes] Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.138 (CVS log)
Received on Tuesday, 14 October 2014 15:51:43 UTC