Re: [EME] Handling CDM availability, permissions, and supported types

On 10/3/14, 6:18 PM, David Dorwin wrote:
>          1. If the member's name is unrecognized or unhandled and the
>             value is not “optional”, continue to next iteration of the loop.

This requirement can't be fulfilled for the "unrecognized" case.  See 
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25923#c40

Other than that, this makes me happy.

>       o It's unclear why this is the case or why the same rule does not
>         apply to Sequence. Maybe Boris knows.

Also see the link above.

-Boris

Received on Saturday, 4 October 2014 02:23:00 UTC