- From: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 12:24:42 -0700
- To: Wayne Borean <wborean@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-html-media@w3.org" <public-html-media@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAEnTvdAVrHRY3inGPxK=7qq-TuFm=6YzMRmJWY3UdbbjiBGjzg@mail.gmail.com>
Wayne, Are you referring back to your comments of June 2013 or something else ? You never answered the Chair's question posed back on 6/13/13. Either way, I think we need a bit more to go on to understand your concern. ...Mark On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Wayne Borean <wborean@gmail.com> wrote: > > Sorry folks, hit the wrong button and sent this to Joe only. > > Wayne > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Wayne Borean <wborean@gmail.com> > Date: Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 3:15 PM > Subject: Re: Request for feedback on EME Use Cases > To: Joe Steele <steele@adobe.com> > > > > Joe, > > I still don't see anything in here about author control. Has it been > overlooked? > > Wayne > > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Joe Steele <steele@adobe.com> wrote: > >> I have completed my changes to the EME Use Cases wiki ( >> https://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/Media_Task_Force/EME_Use_Cases). >> I don’t think I can add much more to the general use cases without more >> constructive feedback from the group. >> Thanks to those of you who have looked and given feedback. For the rest — >> please take a look. >> >> I think we specifically need feedback on: >> >> * Are there general use cases that we should be supporting that are not >> there? >> * Are any of these use cases unsupportable by your DRM? >> * Is the level of detail sufficient? >> * Any additional key delivery mechanisms? >> * Are any of the current key delivery mechanisms objectionable? >> >> Joe Steele >> >> p.s. I apologize for not sending this sooner — it was sitting in my >> Outbox during my vacation. :-( >> > > >
Received on Thursday, 24 July 2014 19:25:10 UTC