Re: Formal Objection to Working Group Decision to publish Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft (FPWD)

I support this objection. 


On Thursday, 30 May 2013 at 21:43, Catherine Roy wrote:

> I support this objection.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Catherine Roy
> http://www.catherine-roy.net
> 
> 
> 
> On 30/05/2013 1:56 AM, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
> > This is a Formal Objection against the Working Group Decision to publish
> > Encrypted Media Extensions specification as a First Public Working Draft
> > (FPWD).
> > 
> > EME is not compatible with the Open Web and can not be made compatible
> > with it.
> > 
> > For simplicity I refer to the Formal Objection raised by the EFF
> > regarding the HTML WG Draft Charter:
> > https://www.eff.org/pages/drm/w3c-formal-objection-html-wg
> > 
> > In addition to that I refer to these two issues:
> > 
> > EME does not allow independent implementation, excluding open source
> > implementations.
> > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20967
> > 
> > That issue was "resolved" by one of the authors of EME as an alleged
> > duplicate of another issue:
> > 
> > EME should do more to encourage/ensure CDM-level interop
> > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20944
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Andreas
> > 
> 
> 
>