RE: Please, reject the EME proposal

Please review the W3C Team blog post at:
http://www.w3.org/QA/2013/05/perspectives_on_encrypted_medi.html

"At the current time, the only content-protection proposal put forth within the HTML Working Group is the EME specification. Other discussions about content protection and alternative solutions to the requirements are taking place in the Restricted Media Community Group<http://www.w3.org/community/restrictedmedia/>, which could feed into the HTML Working Group standards effort."

I also suggest you review the following email in which the W3C Team clearly stated that the EME work is within scope of the HTML WG charter:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2013Feb/0122.html

Thus any discussions about "reject(ing) the EME proposal" are NOT appropriate for the public-html-media@w3.org<mailto:public-html-media@w3.org> email list or for that matter any other HTML WG email list.

If you have specific technical changes/suggestions for the EME Working Draft I recommend that you file bugs against the EME Bugzilla component.

/paulc
HTML WG co-chair

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329

From: piranna@gmail.com [mailto:piranna@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 11:27 AM
To: Emmanuel Revah
Cc: public-html-media@w3.org
Subject: RE: Please, reject the EME proposal


I agree, EME should be discussed on only one list, both for development and criticism.
El 13/05/2013 17:24, "Emmanuel Revah" <stsil@manurevah.com<mailto:stsil@manurevah.com>> escribió:
On 2013/05/13 16:49, Paul Cotton wrote:
Please take this discussion to a more appropriate forum such as
http://www.w3.org/community/restrictedmedia/

Hi Paul,


I'm interested in hearing why certain topics related to EME are welcome here and others not. I've searched but not found any specific guildines for what should be discussed in public-html-media, please do post me a link or further details if I have missed it.

I have subscribed to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-restrictedmedia/ as you suggested. I just hope it's not a list intended to isolate unwanted criticism of EME from other lists.


--
Emmanuel Revah