- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 06:53:34 -0400
- To: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- CC: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>, "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>, "<public-html-media@w3.org>" <public-html-media@w3.org>
On 05/09/2013 09:40 PM, Charles McCathie Nevile wrote: > On Fri, 10 May 2013 01:36:43 +0200, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> >> wrote: >> >>> * Sam Ruby wrote: >>> >The HTML WG co-chairs have reviewed[3] the efforts to resolve these >>> bugs >>> >and found there to be a good faith effort to do so, and accordingly are >>> >approving the request to publish EME[4] as a FPWD. >>> >>> In the interest of having proper public records, I would like to ask the >>> Chairs to revise the text above. The Chairs do not have any authority to >>> approve requests for publication as First Public Working Draft. Only The >>> Director can do that. And for Him to do so, the Chairs have to record >>> the decision of the HTML Working Group to request publication. The above >>> does not record anything along the lines of "The HTML Working Group has >>> decided to request publication", as is required to request publication. >>> I'm also asking the HTML Working Group to direct the Chairs accordingly. >> >> I'm certain that what Sam means is that the chairs have made a >> determination of consensus in the WG that publishing should proceed >> within the defined process [1], > > I doubt they have called "consensus", but "resolution". But then that's > all that is required. > > However, I think Bjoern is perfectly correct to nitpick the process > minutiae and request the chairs make it clear that they have followed > the process exactly to the letter. I agree with you that Bjoern is perfectly correct. The decision was to request publication. And furthermore, I agree that this is a matter over which we clearly do not have consensus. Per the process[1]: - Consensus is not a prerequisite for approval to publish; the Working Group MAY request publication of a Working Draft even if it is unstable and does not meet all Working Group requirements. > cheers > > Chaals - Sam Ruby [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr#first-wd
Received on Friday, 10 May 2013 10:54:07 UTC