- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 11:33:24 +0100
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Cc: Casey Callaghan <caseyc37@gmail.com>, John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>, Andreas Kuckartz <A.Kuckartz@ping.de>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, TimBerners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>, "public-html-media@w3.org" <public-html-media@w3.org>, Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>, "public-restrictedmedia@w3.org" <public-restrictedmedia@w3.org>
A sentence or two does not make it an implementation requirement for HTML5 Which of the other separate specs being developed by the HTML working group are required to be implemented by user agents for HTML5? Regards Stevef On 1 Jun 2013, at 10:43, Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> wrote: > Steve Faulkner, Fri, 31 May 2013 15:40:38 +0100: >> a correction >> >> "EME can be a >> standard on its own, separated from and not required for the >> implementation of standards-compliant HTML." >> >> This is the case for the current EME proposal, it is not a requirement for >> HTML, it is a separate spec. I don't know of any move to include in the >> core HTML spec and would imagine that such a move would not get consensus. > > I think the above is a bit too square since HTML5 has the concept of > applicable spec. It would only take a sentence or two to include EME by > reference. > > Leif H Silli
Received on Saturday, 1 June 2013 10:33:36 UTC