- From: Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 16:22:34 +0000
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- CC: "public-html-media@w3.org" <public-html-media@w3.org>
On Wednesday, December 18, 2013, Sam Ruby wrote: > On 12/18/2013 07:53 AM, Charles McCathie Nevile wrote: > > HTML is expected to return to Last Call. MSE is not, as far as I am aware. > > I just want to make sure I understand. > > Just to be clear, you are *NOT* making the case that MSE is the correct > place to levy this requirement, did I get this correct? > > Others, in fact, are making the case that the HTML specification the > right place for this requirement. > > And, if I am reading you correctly, you would be fine if this > requirement was satisfied in the HTML specification, as long as MSE were > published after HTML. > > Note: I am not suggesting that MSE wait. I am merely trying to > understand what your position is. MSE has a normative dependency on the HTML5 media element. Since it is an extension spec, it seems strange to consider it proceeding ahead of HTML5. Note: It is entirely possible, and with the current state of affairs likely, that MSE will return for a brief Last Call to resolve the outstanding Stream dependency once the Stream API settles down. We discussed this at TPAC: http://www.w3.org/2013/11/14-html-wg-minutes.html#item01 Cheers, Adrian.
Received on Wednesday, 18 December 2013 16:23:36 UTC