Re: Summary of EME bugs

I've attached an updated and prioritized list for the upcoming discussion
at TPAC.

On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Martin Soukup <martin.soukup@irdeto.com>wrote:

>  I believe 18515 and 19788 should be discussed together as both relate to
> the behaviour when a block is encountered for which a key is not available
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> The same may be true of 16553 and 19208 which relate to behaviour when the
> required key is already known by the Key System****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* David Dorwin [mailto:ddorwin@google.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 30, 2012 7:15 PM
> *To:* public-html-media@w3.org
>
> *Subject:* Summary of EME bugs****
>
> ** **
>
> I reviewed the open EME bugs and separated them into two categories -
> those that need discussion and those that just need to be worked on. The
> two lists are attached. We will work from the first list at TPAC Thursday,
> but I don't expect that we will get through all of them.****
>
> ** **
>
> I also addressed several bugs with an update to the draft and closed
> several other bugs. The most important update was updating the figure to
> reflect the new object-oriented version of the API and clarifying decrypted
> frame handling.****
>
> ** **
>
> See you Thursday!****
>
> David****
>