- From: Pierre Saslawsky <pierre@photobiker.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 22:36:30 -0800
- To: public-html-mail@w3.org
If you try to constrain HTML mail to what people legitimately need for Instant Messaging and blog comments, you will end up with a rich- text subset of HTML which is all but doomed to failure. The possibilities offered by browser engines are promised to be used more and more by emailers. CSS is a good example, especially with positioning and editable content. It will allow companies to design their own templates and produce corporate-looking documents directly into the emailer instead of having to send PDF files or MS-Word documents as attachments. Another area of development should be forms. It would allow an email client to compose a message based on an XML-based form template stored on an intranet or a trusted web site. The recipient could access the same template, fill-out the data and return it to the sender, or submit the data to a web site directly from the emailer. Why not for instance allow URLs in the recipients list? Clicking "Send" would mail the completed form to the email recipients with SMTP and submit the data to the specified URLs with HTTP. Besides the convenience of filling out small forms instead of redacting verbose text responses to common requests, users would also benefit from being able to keep a copy of the forms they complete inside their outbox. Isn't it curious to see how people can archive all the data they receive for years but still can't keep a trace of the forms they fill out nor the comments they post on the web? While numerous standards have been developed in the past 15 years to improve the browsing experience, very little has been done for email. As people begin to take advantage of what modern emailers are capable of doing in the receiving end, vendors will continue to improve their products on the composing end - meaning that more standards will be supported, not less, and richer documents will transit over the wire, not poorer - and then it will only be a short time before the market pushes for interoperability between email and web. I hope the orientation taken by this mailing list won't be "How can we confine HTML mail to technologies of the past?" but "How can we make email benefit from the current and future standards?" Preventing people from using available features rarely works. Pierre
Received on Friday, 23 February 2007 06:36:45 UTC