FW: Proposed split of the HTML specification

Hi,

像 CSS 工作组拆分 CSS3 规范一样， HTML 工作组正在拆分 HTML5.1 规范，以加速规范各部分标准化进程，加快接收新的技术规范。

HTML规范拆分仍在进行之中，见：http://darobin.github.io/breakup/specs/


可使用搜索工具来查找感兴趣的部分：http://intertwingly.net/tmp/breakup/


对该规范拆分提案有任何建议或意见，可直接反馈给 HTML 工作组邮件组，或者回复本邮件组。

Thanks,
Zhiqiang

-----Original Message-----
From: Robin Berjon [mailto:robin@w3.org] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 5:17 PM
To: HTML WG (public-html@w3.org)
Subject: Proposed split of the HTML specification

Hi all,

as part of the many discussion about the next steps in HTML, the question of splitting up the HTML spec has come up again. In order to make the discussion simpler, I have made:

     1) A tool that makes it easy to generate splits.

     2) A proposed split to get the discussion rolling.

The idea isn't that my proposed split is perfect; the idea is however that people who want to propose alternatives ought to do so by actually producing one rather than arguing about it. Smaller tweaks to an existing split should be made as pull requests against it.

The DIY breakup is up at:

     https://github.com/darobin/breakup


I encourage you to actually read the README.

The proposed split is up at:

     http://darobin.github.io/breakup/specs/


Some things worth noting about it:

   • I like smaller specs, it's a lot of pieces.

   • The generated output is not perfect, there are notably problems with WebIDL and references. The goal here is to give a concrete idea, not to produce perfect documents.

   • The chunking at times cobbles together section that weren't adjacent in the monolith, which can cause strange transitions. Overall there are wording nits, these can be ironed out *after* (and if) a split has happened.

   • Some content is just dropped on the floor. The list of dropped sections is in the JSON.

   • Cross-linking *ought* to work, but I haven't extensively tested it, bug reports welcome.

Go have fun! :)

--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Received on Friday, 26 June 2015 03:09:29 UTC