W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-diffs@w3.org > September 2010

hixie: omitting a content attribute value makes no sense (whatwg r5556)

From: poot <cvsmail@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 16:58:42 +0900 (JST)
To: public-html-diffs@w3.org
Message-Id: <20100929075842.DD8832BBE7@toro.w3.mag.keio.ac.jp>
hixie: omitting a content attribute value makes no sense (whatwg r5556)

http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/spec/Overview.html?r1=1.4438&r2=1.4439&f=h
http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=5555&to=5556

===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/html5/spec/Overview.html,v
retrieving revision 1.4438
retrieving revision 1.4439
diff -u -d -r1.4438 -r1.4439
--- Overview.html	29 Sep 2010 07:56:47 -0000	1.4438
+++ Overview.html	29 Sep 2010 07:58:26 -0000	1.4439
@@ -18605,8 +18605,8 @@
     (e.g. a blind photographer sharing an image on his blog).</p>
 
     <p>In such cases, the <code title="attr-img-alt"><a href="#attr-img-alt">alt</a></code>
-    attribute's value may be omitted, but one of the following
-    conditions must be met as well:</p>
+    attribute may be omitted, but one of the following conditions must
+    be met as well:</p>
 
     <ul><!-- when editing this list, search for the two other occurrences
      of 'critical-no-alt' --><li>The <code title="attr-title"><a href="#the-title-attribute">title</a></code> attribute is
Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2010 07:59:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:09:10 UTC