- From: poot <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 16:58:42 +0900 (JST)
- To: public-html-diffs@w3.org
hixie: omitting a content attribute value makes no sense (whatwg r5556)
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/spec/Overview.html?r1=1.4438&r2=1.4439&f=h
http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=5555&to=5556
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/html5/spec/Overview.html,v
retrieving revision 1.4438
retrieving revision 1.4439
diff -u -d -r1.4438 -r1.4439
--- Overview.html 29 Sep 2010 07:56:47 -0000 1.4438
+++ Overview.html 29 Sep 2010 07:58:26 -0000 1.4439
@@ -18605,8 +18605,8 @@
(e.g. a blind photographer sharing an image on his blog).</p>
<p>In such cases, the <code title="attr-img-alt"><a href="#attr-img-alt">alt</a></code>
- attribute's value may be omitted, but one of the following
- conditions must be met as well:</p>
+ attribute may be omitted, but one of the following conditions must
+ be met as well:</p>
<ul><!-- when editing this list, search for the two other occurrences
of 'critical-no-alt' --><li>The <code title="attr-title"><a href="#the-title-attribute">title</a></code> attribute is
Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2010 07:59:42 UTC