- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:26:07 +0200
- To: public-html-data-tf@w3.org
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk> wrote: > On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 23:58:10 -0400 > Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com> wrote: > >> 1) A Microdata processor uses a registry (with undefined format and >> update procedure for now) to control the behavior of property URI >> generation. > > -1. If the registry were dynamic, then it creates too much overhead. If > static, then "registry" just becomes a nice name for "special-casing". Why is special-casing a problem when the application layer needs to know about some specific set of vocabularies anyway to do something useful with the RDF graph it obtains from the off-the-shelf extractor that needs two inputs: the document and the registry? -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2011 12:26:45 UTC