- From: Maciej Stachowiak via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 09:29:45 +0000
- To: public-html-commits@w3.org
Update of /sources/public/html5/decision-policy In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv24060 Modified Files: decision-policy.html Log Message: clarify what materials are considered when chairs look at survey results http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12327 Index: decision-policy.html =================================================================== RCS file: /sources/public/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html,v retrieving revision 1.12 retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -d -r1.12 -r1.13 --- decision-policy.html 21 Oct 2009 05:07:08 -0000 1.12 +++ decision-policy.html 16 May 2011 09:29:43 -0000 1.13 @@ -341,7 +341,12 @@ reveal a strongly preferred position; in this case, return to <a href="#escalation-step-3">step 3</a>. Otherwise, the Working Group affirms or overrules the editor's decision depending on the -outcome. The Basic Process then +outcome. When reviewing the results of a survey, the Chairs will +examine the Change Proposals, the survey responses themselves, and any +material linked from a survey response. The Chairs do not guarantee +that any other material, such as email to the WG list related to the +topic, will be considered. Filtering such a volume of material is +impractical. The Basic Process then proceeds from <a href="#basic-step-7a">step 7a</a> or <a href="#basic-step-7b">step 7b</a> as appropriate. <b>** This is an endpoint for the escalation process. **</b> </dd>
Received on Monday, 16 May 2011 09:29:51 UTC