- From: Maciej Stachowiak via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 07:05:57 +0000
- To: public-html-commits@w3.org
Update of /sources/public/html5/decision-policy In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv14246 Modified Files: decision-policy-v2.html Log Message: Remove obsolete references to pre-LC and pre-Last Call http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13033 Index: decision-policy-v2.html =================================================================== RCS file: /sources/public/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy-v2.html,v retrieving revision 1.37 retrieving revision 1.38 diff -u -d -r1.37 -r1.38 --- decision-policy-v2.html 2 Aug 2011 07:03:50 -0000 1.37 +++ decision-policy-v2.html 2 Aug 2011 07:05:55 -0000 1.38 @@ -798,8 +798,9 @@ high volume volume of feedback we see, it is not practical to get to 0 bugs + 0 issues + 0 bugs closed recently enough that someone may be filing an issue shortly at the same time. Therefore, we impose a -cutoff for comments to be taken as pre-LC feedback. Likewise, the W3C -Last Call process itself imposses a cutoff on the Last Call period.</p> +cutoff for comments to be taken as pre-LC feedback during a pre-LC +review period. Likewise, the W3C Last Call process itself imposses a +cutoff on the Last Call period.</p> <p>During such periods, we don't want to call a total stop to useful changes that aren't in response to those bugs. But that might create a @@ -838,12 +839,11 @@ arguably a feature addition - even arguably ambiguous cases such as documenting longstanding de facto standard features.</p> -<p>Therefore during the current pre-LC period, and during Last Call, -feature additions or removals should only be done with sufficient -prior notice to the group, in the form of a bug, a WG decision, or an -on-list discussion. This applies only to LC-track drafts and does not -apply to drafts that may include material for future versions of -HTML.</p> +<p>Therefore during a pre-LC review, or during a Last Call, feature +additions or removals should only be done with sufficient prior notice +to the group, in the form of a bug, a WG decision, or an on-list +discussion. This applies only to LC-track drafts and does not apply to +drafts that may include material for future versions of HTML.</p> <h3>What kind of changes might this revert policy apply to?</h3>
Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2011 07:05:58 UTC