- From: Maciej Stachowiak via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 07:03:52 +0000
- To: public-html-commits@w3.org
Update of /sources/public/html5/decision-policy In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv14147 Modified Files: decision-policy-v2.html Log Message: Unresolved internal links in v2 of decision policy http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13244 Index: decision-policy-v2.html =================================================================== RCS file: /sources/public/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy-v2.html,v retrieving revision 1.36 retrieving revision 1.37 diff -u -d -r1.36 -r1.37 --- decision-policy-v2.html 2 Aug 2011 07:02:18 -0000 1.36 +++ decision-policy-v2.html 2 Aug 2011 07:03:50 -0000 1.37 @@ -456,7 +456,7 @@ for Consensus (<a href="#escalation-step-4a">step 4.a</a>). If there are obvious objections or other alternatives, the Chairs may instead issue a Call for Alternate Proposals -(<a href="#escalation-step-4.b">step 4.b</a>).</p> +(<a href="#escalation-step-4b">step 4.b</a>).</p> <p>During the discussion period, and at all stages in the process, the Chairs will strive to guide the Working Group towards consensus. If @@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ </p> </dd> -<dt id="escalation-sep-4.a">4.a. Call for Consensus</dt> +<dt id="escalation-step-4a">4.a. Call for Consensus</dt> <dd>If the Chairs believe it is clear that the existing spec or some available Change Proposal enjoys consensus, they issue a Call for Consensus to solicit objections. Based on the response, proceed to the @@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ such a Call in the first place, the Chairs may proceed directly to <a href="#escalation-step-5b">step 5.b</a> without a Call for Consensus.</dd> -<dt id="escalation-sep-4.b">4.b. Call for Alternate Proposals</dt> +<dt id="escalation-step-4b">4.b. Call for Alternate Proposals</dt> <dd><p>When a Change Proposal has been submitted, but it's clear that some Working Group members would prefer a different change, or the status quo spec text, the Chairs issue a Call for Alternate @@ -779,7 +779,7 @@ <dd> <p>If the Chairs decide to reopen the issue, then the issue is moved back to OPEN state. The escalation process proceeds from Call for -Alternate Proposals (<a href="#escalation-step-4.b">step +Alternate Proposals (<a href="#escalation-step-4b">step 4.b</a>). Note: a reopened issue may no longer qualify to be considered during a currently running Pre-LC or LC review period and may instead be taken up in the next milestone.
Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2011 07:03:58 UTC