- From: Clint Hill <clint.hill@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:16:28 -0700
- To: Eric Franzon <eric@semanticweb.com>
- Cc: public-html-comments@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 27 November 2012 21:17:06 UTC
I'm a developer of no particular prominence - but I feel compelled to state my support for the Microdata CR. To keep developers from confusion is a very weak argument (let alone a bit insulting - are you implying we can't handle it?). I've not heard compelling arguments for why Microdata doesn't deserve to be a CR, rather I've only heard protectionism. On Nov 27, 2012, at 11:57 AM, Eric Franzon <eric@semanticweb.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > As an AC Rep (for SemanticWeb.com) and as someone who regularly interacts with developers just being introduced to Semantic Web concepts for the first time, I am writing to state my agreement with the position outlined by Manu Sporny in this post: > http://manu.sporny.org/2012/microdata-cr/ > > Moving Microdata forward toward recommendation status adds confusion in an area already rife with confusion. I believe that Microdata should be published as a W3C Note. > > Best, > --Eric > > -- > Eric Axel Franzon > Vice President of Community > SemanticWeb.com > 6080 Center Dr., 6th Floor > Los Angeles, CA 90045 > > eric@semanticweb.com > > LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/ericfranzon > Twitter: http://twitter.com/SemanticWeb >
Received on Tuesday, 27 November 2012 21:17:06 UTC