- From: Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 15:53:33 +0900
- To: Reinaldo Ferraz <reinaldo@nic.br>
- Cc: public-html-comments@w3.org
In response to your comments, I have opened up the following bug reports: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12873 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12874 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12875 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12876 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12877 You can add yourself to the CC Lists for those bugs -- which will require that you create a W3C Bugzilla user account (if you don't have one already): http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/createaccount.cgi Reinaldo Ferraz <reinaldo@nic.br>, 2011-06-01 16:29 -0300: > Dear Srs. > > Follow my contributions to the document *HTML5: Techniques for providing > useful text alternatives* > > Best Regards > Reinaldo Ferraz > > -------------------------------------------------- > *Examples of scenarios where users benefit from text alternatives for > images* > Add: > - They have problems to load images or the source of image is wrong > -------------------------------------------------- > > Question: In the *Example 2.5*, is it possible to use Image maps <map></map> > to create alternatives and to put ALT inside of each <area> tag? > -------------------------------------------------- > > Removing the link *Providing a text alternative that is not null. (e.g., > alt="spacer" or alt="image") for images that should be ignored by assistive > technology [WCAG20-TECHS]*. In that way, it would made users confused about > the meaning (if the user doesnt click on the link) > > In the *Example 6.4*, I consider important a short description to the image. > It´s important even for a blind person or somebody who cannot load images > perceive that there is an image with a purpose: create a medieval atmosphere > to the webpage. I disagree that the image with description is only related > to the blind or low vision webpage. The link example shows the users > preference http://webaim.org/projects/screenreadersurvey/#images > > -------------------------------------------------- > > I belive that *3.11 A group of images that form a single larger picture with > and without links* is not necessary. the same situation is been using at the > examples *Example 1.1* and *Example 1.2* > > > -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike
Received on Friday, 3 June 2011 06:53:33 UTC