- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:24:32 +0100
- To: Cameron Heavon-Jones <cmhjones@gmail.com>
- CC: mike amundsen <mamund@yahoo.com>, Mirko Gustony <mirko.gustony@gmail.com>, thibault <thibault@miximum.fr>, public-html-comments@w3.org
On 2011-12-13 16:16, Cameron Heavon-Jones wrote: > > On 13/12/2011, at 3:09 PM, mike amundsen wrote: > >> Based on repeated comments about what this issue of what the browser >> user-agent *expects* as a return for PUT/DELETE, I wonder if things >> would go better if the Prefer header proposal was included in all >> this. >> >> mca >> http://amundsen.com/blog/ >> http://twitter.com@mamund >> http://mamund.com/foaf.rdf#me >> > > Personally i don't agree with "Prefer" header but i stated this previously, as it is optional i just choose not to use it. > > If it satisfies concerns i have no problem referencing it as something people can use. Well, to make this "work", we'd need to define a Preference token, and mandate that the browser sends it. Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 13 December 2011 15:25:11 UTC