- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:15:44 -0400
- To: Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>
- CC: public-html-comments@w3.org, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
On 09/30/2010 03:04 PM, Shelley Powers wrote: > On 9/30/10 1:21 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: >> On 09/30/2010 01:13 PM, Shelley Powers wrote: >>> According to the Last Call timeline, starting tomorrow (Oct 1) all new >>> bugs in the HTML WG bugzilla data are automatically labeled Last Call >>> comments, which is somewhat equivalent to being made an issue, directly. >> >> How did you come to that conclusion? >> >> My assumption is that bugs entered during Last Call will be processed >> in a manner very similar to the way that bugs are resolved today: a >> set of them will be FIXED, a set will be WONTFIX and not pursued, and >> a set will become TrackerRequests and we will solicit change proposals. > > Because the timeline said that bugs entered into the database after > October 1 will be treated like Last Call comments. > > " > - Oct 1, 2010 - cutoff for bugs to be considered as pre-LC feedback > Consequence of missing this date: bugs beyond this date will be treated > as Last Call comments. The Chairs could grant exceptions on a > case-by-case basis, but in general there is no guarantee of a bug filed > after the cutoff being settled before Last Call. > " And how, exactly is that "somewhat equivalent to being made an issue, directly"? I'm assuming that the general process will be roughly the same; the key difference is that bugs entered after October 1 will not be guaranteed to block entrance to Last Call. If there are suggestions as to how the process should be changed, I would suggest entering them as bugs on the Decision Policy: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/enter_bug.cgi?product=HTML%20WG&component=working+group+Decision+Policy >> - Sam Ruby > > Shelley - Sam Ruby
Received on Thursday, 30 September 2010 19:51:37 UTC