- From: Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>
- Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 07:42:09 -0500
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- CC: public-html-comments@w3.org
On 10/4/10 5:47 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > On 09/30/2010 09:04 PM, Shelley Powers wrote: >> The existing Formal Objection Tracker[1] is missing a Formal Objection. >> I submitted a formal objection in June[2], with follow up emails[3][4]. >> >> Please record these in the Formal Objection Tracker. >> >> Thank you. >> >> Shelley >> >> [1] http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/formal-objection-status.html >> [2] >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-comments/2010Jun/0005.html >> >> [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jun/0277.html >> [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2010Jun/0047.html > > I am having trouble finding a way to treat this as a formal objection. > Per the W3C Process[1] "In the W3C process, an individual may register > a Formal Objection to a decision". This is a problem as I have yet to > find any record that indicates that the Working Group has decided to > include references to the WHATWG in the specification of HTML5. > > The path I would recommend is to open a bug report. If the resolution > of that bug report does not resolve your concern, the bug can be > marked with a TrackerRequest, and that will[6] result in a decision > (even if only a declaration of Amicable Consensus) which CAN be > appealed. Furthermore, once an issue is raised, a link to the issue > itself in the relevant section(s) can be requested. However, you yourself acknowledged that what I presented at the time was a Formal Objection[1], based on the fact that the group made a decision to continue with the publication of the next heartbeat document even though the document still referenced WhatWG documents. > - Sam Ruby > > [5] > http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies#WGArchiveMinorityViews > [6] http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html#basic > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jun/0274.html > > > > >
Received on Monday, 4 October 2010 12:42:46 UTC