- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 06:47:55 -0400
- To: Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>
- CC: public-html-comments@w3.org
On 09/30/2010 09:04 PM, Shelley Powers wrote: > The existing Formal Objection Tracker[1] is missing a Formal Objection. > I submitted a formal objection in June[2], with follow up emails[3][4]. > > Please record these in the Formal Objection Tracker. > > Thank you. > > Shelley > > [1] http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/formal-objection-status.html > [2] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-comments/2010Jun/0005.html > [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jun/0277.html > [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2010Jun/0047.html I am having trouble finding a way to treat this as a formal objection. Per the W3C Process[1] "In the W3C process, an individual may register a Formal Objection to a decision". This is a problem as I have yet to find any record that indicates that the Working Group has decided to include references to the WHATWG in the specification of HTML5. The path I would recommend is to open a bug report. If the resolution of that bug report does not resolve your concern, the bug can be marked with a TrackerRequest, and that will[6] result in a decision (even if only a declaration of Amicable Consensus) which CAN be appealed. Furthermore, once an issue is raised, a link to the issue itself in the relevant section(s) can be requested. - Sam Ruby [5] http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies#WGArchiveMinorityViews [6] http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html#basic
Received on Monday, 4 October 2010 10:49:00 UTC