- From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 16:16:44 +0700
- To: "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>
- Cc: public-html-comments@w3.org
OK. I've raised a bug: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11256 James On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org> wrote: > Hi James, > > The HTML Working Group is using a bugzilla instance as its primary tracking > tool for comments on the HTML5 spec and other deliverables of the group. > > So, if you would be amenable taking the same problem description and > potential solution that you've outlined here, and raising it as a new bug > in our bugzilla, that'd be the preferred way to get it on the radar for the > editor, the group, and the chairs for the group. > > You can file a new bug here: > > http://w3.org/brief/MjA2 > > I think you probably have a bugzilla account already. But if you have any > problems accessing it, or figuring out what your password is, please just > let me know. > > Otherwise, if you'd rather not deal with getting it into bugzilla yourself, > I can raise a new bug for it there myself, and link it to the copy of this > message (and any subsequent thread) in our mail archives. > > --Mike > > James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>, 2010-11-08 10:17 +0700: > >> The HTML5 <article> element seems potentially very useful, but there >> seems to me to be an aspect of the overall design that makes it work >> not quite as well as it might. > [...] >> One way round this might be a "nosection" boolean attribute on <body>, >> which would say to the outline algorithm not to create a section for >> the <body> element, and which would be valid only when the <body> >> element consists of a single sectioning content element. > > -- > Michael(tm) Smith > http://people.w3.org/mike >
Received on Monday, 8 November 2010 09:17:18 UTC